This report studies the Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments market, Nanomechanical test methods such as nanoindentation and nano-scratch are now well established techniques for the characterisation and optimisation of thin films, coatings and micro-scale structures.
The Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments consumption volume was 156 units in 2017 and is expected to reach 165 units in 2018 and 223 units in 2023, growing at a CAGR of 6.21% from 2018 to 2023. North America`s sales volume accounted for the highest market share (32.69%) in 2017, followed by the Europe, China and Japan.
At present, the manufactures of Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments are concentrated in Europe, North America, China and Japan. North America is the largest production area in the world, which occupied about 43.59% in 2017. The following area is Europe. The global leading players in this market are Bruker, Keysight, Micro Materials, aep Technology etc.
The Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments are mainly used by industrial manufacturing, advance material development, electronics. The dominated application of Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments is Advance Material Development, which accounting for 47% sales volume market share in 2017.
The Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments market was valued at 31 Million US$ in 2018 and is projected to reach 55 Million US$ by 2025, at a CAGR of 7.6% during the forecast period. In this study, 2018 has been considered as the base year and 2019 to 2025 as the forecast period to estimate the market size for Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments.
This report presents the worldwide Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments market size (value, production and consumption), splits the breakdown (data status 2014-2019 and forecast to 2025), by manufacturers, region, type and application.
This study also analyzes the market status, market share, growth rate, future trends, market drivers, opportunities and challenges, risks and entry barriers, sales channels, distributors and Porter's Five Forces Analysis.
The following manufacturers are covered in this report:
Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments Breakdown Data by Type
Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments Breakdown Data by Application
Advance Material Development
Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments Production by Region
Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments Consumption by Region
Rest of Europe
Central & South America
Rest of South America
Middle East & Africa
Rest of Middle East & Africa
The study objectives are:
To analyze and research the global Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments status and future forecast，involving, production, revenue, consumption, historical and forecast.
To present the key Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments manufacturers, production, revenue, market share, and recent development.
To split the breakdown data by regions, type, manufacturers and applications.
To analyze the global and key regions market potential and advantage, opportunity and challenge, restraints and risks.
To identify significant trends, drivers, influence factors in global and regions.
To analyze competitive developments such as expansions, agreements, new product launches, and acquisitions in the market.
In this study, the years considered to estimate the market size of Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments :
History Year: 2014 - 2018
Base Year: 2018
Estimated Year: 2019
Forecast Year: 2019 - 2025
This report includes the estimation of market size for value (million USD) and volume (Units). Both top-down and bottom-up approaches have been used to estimate and validate the market size of Nano-Mechanical Testing Instruments market, to estimate the size of various other dependent submarkets in the overall market. Key players in the market have been identified through secondary research, and their market shares have been determined through primary and secondary research. All percentage shares, splits, and breakdowns have been determined using secondary sources and verified primary sources.
For the data information by region, company, type and application, 2018 is considered as the base year. Whenever data information was unavailable for the base year, the prior year has been considered.